Data Check

One of the principle arguments for turning the nation upside down with a single-payer/socialized medicine program is the whine that “Over 50% of American bankruptcies are caused by medical expenses.”

Nice line. Pulls the heartstrings and causes a need to feel warm and fuzzy by “doing something” about it.

But, like most liberal propaganda, it is a lie.

The figure comes from a 2005 Harvard University study saying that 54 percent of bankruptcies in 2001 were caused by health expenses. We reviewed it internally and knocked it down at the time; an academic reviewer did the same in 2006. Recalculating Harvard’s own data, he came up with a far lower figure – 17 percent.

…..

A more recent study by another group, approaching it another way, indicates that in 2007 about eight-tenths of one percent of Americans lived in families that filed for bankruptcy as a result of medical costs.

…..

A good part of the problem is definitional. The Harvard report claims to measure the extent to which medical costs are “the cause” of bankruptcies. In reality its survey asked if these costs were “a reason” – potentially one of many – for such bankruptcies.

Beyond those who gave medical costs as “a reason,” the Harvard researchers chose to add in any bankruptcy filers who had at least $1,000 in unreimbursed medical expenses in the previous two years. Given deductibles and copays, that’s a heck of a lot of people.

Moreover, Harvard’s definition of “medical” expenses includes situations that aren’t necessarily medical in common parlance, e.g., a gambling problem, or the death of a family member. If your main wage-earning spouse gets hit by a bus and dies, and you have to file, that’s included as a “medical bankruptcy.”

When I asked the lead author, Dr. David Himmelstein, about his definitions of medical bankruptcy back in 2005, he said, “It’s a judgment call,” and added that any death, for example, “to our mind is a medical event.”

So if you die without a large enough amount of life insurance and your family has to file for Chapter 11 because of a lack of income, your death gets put into the pile of statistics being used to force your heirs to get rationed care via Uncle Obama.

Makes those goofy tests they preform before issuing your policy sound a little less goofy.
Lies, damned lies, and statistics. Indeed.

Found via RTftWC

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Data Check

  1. Rivrdog says:

    Well now, this little inaccuracy problem is right up the LightBringer’s alley. Fits his pistol, to use a metaphor that DOESN’T fit…….

    As reliably reported on my humble blog this morning, Obama has a new “Scientific Integrity” guy, who was quoted on the lead story on Yahoo! News this morning.

    The Science Advisor made the mistake of being a bit too wide in his declaration that only scientists who use good science need apply at the White House. I then construed this news as welcome, it being the apparent end of Anthropogenic Global Warming theory for one, and Rahm Emanuel’s coming attempt to cook the books in the Census for another.

    So Obama picks on Bush policy on stem cells, but leaves the door open to flush out other “bad science”.

    I’m not holding my breath, but it at least gives the Right an opening, assuming that we can get by the dumping of Bush’s religion-based stem cell policy. If we can’t get by that, we’ve just lost the best opportunity we’ll ever have to hammer the AGW crap into the ground.

  2. MK says:

    Where would liberals be without, lies and ignorance, that’s right in the dustbin of history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.